could ndph be more than a headache disorder?

 

New Brain Imaging Research May Open the Door to a New Way of Understanding—and Eventually Treating—New Daily Persistent Headache

By Jeffrey Fowler
Director, NDPH Research Foundation

For years, New Daily Persistent Headache (NDPH) has been defined by one simple but frustrating characteristic: a headache that begins suddenly and never goes away.

According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3), NDPH is diagnosed when a person develops a continuous headache within 24 hours of onset that persists for more than three months after other causes have been ruled out.

That definition has helped physicians recognize NDPH, but it doesn't explain one of the biggest questions patients ask:

Why does this happen?

A groundbreaking brain imaging study published in The Journal of Headache and Pain may bring us one step closer to answering that question.

Looking Beyond Pain

Using ultra-high-resolution 7-Tesla MRI technology, researchers examined the brains of patients living with NDPH. Rather than finding abnormalities confined to traditional pain-processing areas, they identified changes in a collection of interconnected brain regions involved in emotion, motivation, memory, attention, and pain regulation.

Among the areas showing differences were the:

  • anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)
  • amygdala
  • hippocampus
  • nucleus accumbens

Together, these structures form what neuroscientists call the frontolimbic network—a system that helps the brain decide what is important, regulate emotional responses, process pain, and adapt to stressful experiences.

Instead of viewing NDPH solely as a headache disorder, these findings suggest it may involve persistent dysfunction within the brain's pain-emotion networks.

A Surprising Connection

One of the most intriguing aspects of the study is that these same brain regions have been repeatedly implicated in several other neurological conditions.

Researchers studying:

  • post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  • persistent symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury (concussion)
  • chronic pain disorders
  • migraine

have reported abnormalities in many of these same neural circuits.

Although NDPH is clearly not PTSD or traumatic brain injury, the overlap suggests these conditions may share common mechanisms involving disrupted communication between brain networks responsible for pain, stress, emotion, and salience—the brain's ability to determine what demands our attention.

Many neuroscientists now believe these disorders are best understood as network disorders, rather than diseases caused by damage to a single location in the brain.

Rethinking NDPH

This growing body of evidence fits with another emerging idea: that NDPH is not one disease but a syndrome with multiple biological causes.

Previous research has already suggested that persistent daily headache can arise from several different mechanisms, including:

  • spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks
  • post-viral inflammation
  • immune dysfunction
  • connective tissue disorders
  • vascular abnormalities
  • persistent neuroinflammatory activation

The new imaging findings add another possible layer by suggesting that, regardless of the initial trigger, many patients may eventually develop persistent dysfunction within the brain's frontolimbic pain networks.

If confirmed, this could help explain why patients with very different medical histories often experience remarkably similar symptoms.

Could Brain Network Therapies Help?

If NDPH involves dysfunctional brain networks rather than simply persistent pain signals, an important question naturally follows:

Can those networks be reset?

Researchers around the world are actively investigating treatments designed to modify large-scale brain networks.

These include:

  • ketamine
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
  • neurofeedback
  • psychedelic-assisted therapies
  • other forms of neuromodulation

One treatment that has attracted increasing scientific interest is ibogaine, a naturally occurring psychoactive compound that appears to influence multiple neurotransmitter systems involved in learning, memory, reward, and neuroplasticity.

Laboratory studies suggest ibogaine may promote widespread reorganization of neural networks, although exactly how this occurs remains under investigation.

Magnesium has also attracted attention because of its established role in headache medicine and its ability to modulate NMDA receptors, which are involved in pain processing and neural plasticity.

Recently, investigators at Stanford University reported encouraging results using magnesium-assisted ibogaine therapy in veterans with traumatic brain injuries and PTSD. The study demonstrated substantial improvements in PTSD symptoms, leading researchers to ask whether similar network-based approaches might eventually have applications in other disorders involving frontolimbic dysfunction.

An Important Word of Caution

While these findings are exciting, it is essential to distinguish between scientific rationale and proven treatment.

At present:

  • There are no clinical studies demonstrating that ibogaine is effective for NDPH.
  • Ibogaine is currently illegal in the United States.
  • Ibogaine carries significant risks, including potentially life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, psychiatric complications, and dangerous drug interactions.
  • Any future investigation would require rigorous medical supervision, careful patient selection, and approval through formal clinical research protocols.

The purpose of this emerging hypothesis is not to recommend ibogaine as a treatment today. Rather, it is to encourage research into whether therapies capable of modifying dysfunctional brain networks could someday benefit carefully selected patients with refractory NDPH.

Where Research Goes Next

Before therapies such as ibogaine could be considered for NDPH, several important research questions must be answered.

Researchers first need to:

  • confirm the new MRI findings in larger groups of patients
  • determine whether there are identifiable subtypes of NDPH based on brain network changes
  • compare these patterns with migraine, PTSD, and persistent post-concussion syndrome
  • study whether existing neuromodulatory therapies can normalize these network abnormalities

Only after these questions have been answered would it be appropriate to consider carefully designed clinical trials of higher-risk interventions.

Looking Toward the Future

The history of medicine is filled with moments when advances in technology fundamentally changed how diseases were understood.

The introduction of high-resolution brain imaging may represent one of those moments for NDPH.

Rather than viewing NDPH simply as a chronic headache disorder, researchers are beginning to explore whether it is better understood as a disorder of interconnected brain networks regulating pain, emotion, attention, and stress.

If this new perspective proves correct, it could reshape how we diagnose NDPH, classify its subtypes, and develop future treatments aimed not merely at reducing pain, but at restoring normal brain function.

For patients who have long searched for answers, that possibility offers something the NDPH community has needed for many years: a promising new direction for research.

 

is it time to rethink new daily persistent headache?

 

By Jeffrey Fowler

Director, NDPH Research Foundation

For nearly two decades, New Daily Persistent Headache (NDPH) has been defined by one defining characteristic: a headache that begins suddenly, becomes constant within 24 hours, and persists for at least three months. This definition, established by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3), has provided physicians with a standardized way to diagnose NDPH and distinguish it from other headache disorders.

But is this definition telling the whole story?

An increasing body of research suggests that it may not.

Looking Beyond the Headache

The current definition of NDPH focuses on how the headache begins, not why it begins. Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria may have very different underlying biological conditions that all produce the same outward symptom—a persistent daily headache.

In other words, NDPH may not be a single disease. It may be a clinical syndrome, where multiple biological processes result in the same pattern of symptoms.

What Does the Research Tell Us?

Over the past decade, researchers have identified several potential mechanisms that may contribute to the development of persistent daily headache in different groups of patients.

These include:

  • Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders, such as spontaneous CSF leaks and intracranial hypotension, which can closely resemble NDPH and may be difficult to detect with routine imaging.
  • Persistent neuroinflammation, particularly following viral infections, where inflammatory molecules within the central nervous system may continue to drive headache long after the initial illness has resolved.
  • Post-infectious syndromes, including cases reported after infections such as Epstein-Barr virus and COVID-19.
  • Immune-mediated disorders, where abnormal immune responses may contribute to persistent headache. Researchers have also begun exploring whether rare conditions such as IgG4-related disease could explain symptoms in selected patients, although this remains an area of active investigation.
  • Connective tissue disorders, which may increase the risk of spontaneous CSF leaks or alter the body's ability to regulate intracranial pressure.
  • Vascular and venous abnormalities, including conditions that affect venous drainage and intracranial pressure. While disorders such as Nutcracker syndrome have been proposed as possible contributors in some patients, additional research is needed before any causal relationship can be established.

Taken together, these findings suggest that what we currently call NDPH may actually represent a shared clinical endpoint resulting from multiple different biological pathways.

A New Way of Thinking About NDPH

The traditional approach has been to classify NDPH as a primary headache disorder after other known causes have been ruled out.

However, as our understanding of headache biology continues to evolve, it may be more useful to think of NDPH as a syndrome with several possible subtypes.

Future classifications could potentially include categories such as:

  • Idiopathic NDPH (no identifiable cause)
  • Post-infectious NDPH
  • Inflammatory or immune-mediated NDPH
  • CSF pressure-related NDPH
  • Connective tissue-associated NDPH
  • Vascular or venous outflow-associated NDPH

This approach would not change the clinical definition of NDPH but would encourage physicians to look more closely for underlying mechanisms that may guide diagnosis and treatment.

Why This Matters

For many people living with NDPH, treatment has been frustrating because therapies often focus on controlling symptoms rather than addressing the biological cause of the headache.

If future research confirms that NDPH includes multiple distinct subtypes, patients could benefit from more personalized diagnostic evaluations and targeted therapies. Instead of asking only, "Does this patient have NDPH?" clinicians might also ask, "What biological process is causing this patient's NDPH?"

That shift could represent an important step toward precision medicine in headache care.

Looking Ahead

The current ICHD-3 definition remains an essential tool for diagnosing NDPH, and it has helped standardize research around the world. However, advances in neuroimaging, immunology, genetics, and biomarker discovery are revealing a more complex picture than was appreciated when the disorder was first classified.

As new evidence emerges, future revisions of headache classification may move beyond describing what the headache looks like and begin incorporating why it occurs.

Understanding NDPH as a biologically diverse syndrome has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, stimulate new research, and ultimately lead to more effective, individualized treatments for patients living with this challenging condition.

About the Author

Jeffrey Fowler is Director of the NDPH Research Foundation, where he advocates for research into the underlying mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of New Daily Persistent Headache. His work focuses on advancing a precision medicine approach to NDPH by promoting investigation into the diverse biological pathways that may contribute to this complex disorder.

resolution of NDPH with venlafaxine

TNF-alpha has long been suspected as a player in some cases of New Daily Persistent Headache.  Todd Rozen recorded elevated TNF-a in the CSF, but not serum, in a group of NDPH patients back in 2007.  Doxycycline, a known TNF-a antagonist has been trialed with mixed results.  This case report of a 24 year old male with a 6-year-long headache chases the elevated TNF-a theory with a new approach.

Case Report Summary: “A 24-year-old male presented with a 6-year-long continuous headache characterized by constant, bilateral pressure emanating from his temple. There was no family or pertinent past medical history. The pain had a pulsatile nature, and pain intensity was mostly constant at 8–9, on a self-reported numerical pain scale, with periods of increased pain reaching up to a 10. The pain was associated with exhaustion, nausea but not vomiting, position sensitivity, or photophobia. His symptoms led to difficulty in schoolwork and social interactions. From onset, the headache took a day to reach both 24/7 constancy and peak intensity. He could specifically recall the moment of headache onset, noting that it slowly built in intensity over a 24 h, making it inconsistent with a thunderclap onset. The patient sought medical evaluation and treatment from over 12 medical professionals including several headache specialists.

The patient self-administered Excedrin, Ibuprofen, and Acetaminophen without any benefit prompting a visit to his local neurologist. He was then administered Topiramate which was ineffective. The constancy of headache and associated nausea prompted a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study with contrast, in order to rule out any brain abnormalities, and found nothing of note. A sleep study was also conducted in order to rule out sleep apnea, which has been associated with chronic daily headache, and found no sleep abnormalities. Eventually, the patient sought out a headache specialist who found potentially elevated cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure (24 cm H2O) via lumbar puncture. A second puncture did not find elevation, and neither puncture improved the patient’s headache. Both punctures were taken in the lateral decubitus position. CSF analysis showed no evidence of meningitis, encephalitis, or any other abnormalities. Fundoscopic examination identified no papilledema which in conjunction with both lumbar punctures ruled out pseudotumor cerebri. Failure of headache responsiveness to Indomethacin ruled out hemicrania continua. Sustained pain and continued difficulty in school work led to a neuropsychiatric evaluation. Two areas of significant impairment were identified including immediate and delayed recall within stories (Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R)) and notably slow manual speed and dexterity in non-dominant left hand. Based on this history, he met the criteria for NDPH as outlined by International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) beta.  Further physical examination identified cervical hypermobility, a trait associated with NDPH irrespective of triggering event.   Patient also exhibited discomfort over the auriculotemporal nerve distribution and tenderness over the greater occipital nerve region.

The patient cited a stressful life event as the triggering factor of the headache. Unlike other reported cases, our patient identified a prolonged period of stress associated with his transition to college life, rather than a singular triggering event. He was also heavily involved in academic research work, adding another layer of stress and workload. Directly prior to onset, patient reported period of biphasic sleep, high stress, and long “work” hours. The patient denied usage of alcohol or any illicit drug. There was no associated fever or chills. Patient also denies usage of any medications prior to onset or during treatment, other than those prescribed ruling out a medication-overuse headache. In total, over 20 medications/treatments were administered with no long-term benefit to headache pain.  However, we found that daily administration of Venlafaxine resulted in reduction of pain along with improving other symptoms such as nausea, exhaustion, and neuropsychiatric deficiencies.

The patient was administered 37.5 mg of Venlafaxine and instructed to incrementally increase dosage by 37.5 mg every week if no adverse side effects occurred. We found that a dosage of 300 mg resulted in a predictable attenuation of headache pain with the average pain score decreasing to a 3. After 3 months of treatment, we tried to see if removal of Venlafaxine would allow for retention of improvement. Following a 3 week washout, there was a rise in headache pain back to baseline along with accompanying symptoms. Readministration and titration of Venlafaxine once again ameliorated symptoms. Interestingly, 6 more months of Venlafaxine treatment resulted in resolution of pain.

In another case of NDPH, a patient with a proposed thunderclap onset subset of NDPH had complete remission of headache following administration of Nimodipine.  Nimodipine is a calcium channel blocker traditionally used in treating cardiovascular diseases, but now mostly used in the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage. It also appears to inhibit TNF-α production by microglial cells, through inhibition of NADPH preventing superoxide production.   In addition, Nimodipine inhibits cerebral artery vasospasm, a known downstream effect of TNF-α.

This patient was administered Nimodipine, but found no major relief. To some, this may point to a non-TNF-α method of activity for Venlafaxine treatment. However, the mechanism of action for both drugs is different. We speculate that NDPH is a cluster of diseases driven by chronic inflammation via TNF-α within the CSF explaining heterogeneity in specific drug responsiveness, but homogeneity in ultimate drug activity. Other NDPH case reports also suggest an inflammatory pathogenesis.”

This case report is important for several reasons.  The patient presents with classic NDPH including observed joint hypermobility that has been noted in multiple reports.  The significance of joint hypermobility seems apparent, yet, no hypothesis for a hypermobile/NDPH relationship has yet surfaced.  The trial of Venlafaxine in headache management is not extraordinary, however, most anecdotal reports that this author has observed from headache specialists, rarely achieve doses above 150mg.  This case report demonstrates attenuation at a dosage of 300mg. The general consensus is, 300mg could be difficult to reach due to adverse events, side effects.   An extremely conservative titration regimen may reduce AE’s.

The presented hypothesis of venlafaxine acting as an antagonist to TNF-a certainly seems reasonable, considering their washout and reintroduction period.  Yet, I suppose some other action of Venlafaxine not considered could have been responsible.  Venlafaxine is also known to have unique anti-pathogenic properties through bacterial efflux pump inhibition.  A case could be made that some NDPH is some sort of persistent infection and that if a case report hypothesized such and presented venlafaxine attenuating via it’s anti-pathogenic effects, a different conclusion could be inferred.   Until future research better elucidates the etiology of NDPH, we just don’t know.

NDPH Research Foundation is interested in supporting the following studies:

Cytokine, TNF-a CSF levels in a group of patients and controls.

Venlafaxine trial with TNF-a CSF levels before and after.

PCR -  blood serum , CSF & temporal artery tissue

We need your support, please donate to help fund research.  We are a 100% volunteer non-profit.

 

New Daily Persistent Headache

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a primary headache syndrome which can mimic chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. The headache is daily and unremitting from very soon after onset (within 3 days at most), usually in a person who does not have a history of a primary headache disorder. The pain can be intermittent, but lasts more than 3 months. Headache onset is abrupt and people often remember the date, circumstance and, occasionally, the time of headache onset. One retrospective study stated that over 80% of patients could state the exact date their headache began.[1]

The cause of NDPH is unknown, and it may have more than one etiology. NDPH onset is commonly associated with an infection or flu-like illness, stressful life event, minor head trauma, and extra cranial surgery. Infection or flu-like illness and stressful life event are most often cited.[1] The pathophysiology of NDPH is poorly understood.

The syndrome is difficult to treat and may persist for years. The age of onset ranges from 6 to greater than 70 years old, with a mean of 35 years. It is found to be more common in females in both the adult and pediatric populations. NDPH is rare. The Akershus study of chronic headache, a population based cross sectional study of 30,000 persons aged 30–44 years in Norway, found a one-year prevalence of 0.03 percent in the population.[2]

In 1986, Vanast was the first author to describe the new daily-persistent headache (NDPH) as a benign form of chronic daily headache (CDH).[3] The criteria for the diagnosis of NDPH were proposed in 1994 (the Silberstein–Lipton criteria)[4] but not included in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) until 2004.  (Wikipedia)

New Daily Persistent Headache being poorly understood, we hope to bring interest and possibly demonstrate involved pathways of mechanism for future study. We are interested in funding trials of combinations of off label readily available medications that have a history of anecdotal limited efficacy in treating the symptoms of New Daily Persistent headache and or other related symptoms.  For example: neurontin, flunarizine, propranolol, topiramate, famciclovir, LDN have some history of efficacy for NDPH. We are interested in multiple combinations of these drugs which have in other trials shown greater efficacy with a synergistic effect towards a variety of conditions.   66% of chronic migrainers also present with fibromyalgia. We are interested in trialing off label readily available medications that have some efficacy in treating chronic migraine and fibromyalgia. We believe that some patients with Chronic Migraine, NDPH, Fibromyalgia, PTSD, ME/CFS, Lyme Disease, CRPS & GWI have more in common with each other than with episodic migrainers.  We are open to the idea that NDPH is not a subset of migraine at all and that perhaps it should be studied along with neuroinflammatory conditions triggered by some metabolic dysfunction.

Jeff Fowler, Director

NDPH Research Foundation

 

qtq80-rCrTb9

Join Us

  • We are an IRS 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization that is 100% volunteer, there are no salaries or employees, please help us by donating.